A Balanced Curriculum: Standards and Assessments for High Performance

The article of David Squires and Angelique Arrington entitled A Balanced program Standards and Assessments for High Performance, presented a conversation-style elaboration of the said topic enabling the readers to have a better sense of the points from the different perspectives of the people involved in the process.The article basically emphasized on how two teachers and a principal discussed their platform and the methods they utilize in educating the students through lectures and activities and what require to be improved for the students better execution in matter tests (Squires & Arrington, 1999). In analyzing this article, two its positive and negative implications be interpreted into consideration.The authors basically asserted that after spy a breeding program introduced in a peculiar(prenominal) school, prosecute the close ill-use would be to examine the syllabus of the school. In doing so, the discussants impart be adequate to(p) to have an overview of how the school is balancing, reorient and assessing their programs to assistant prepare the students for state exams.Squires and Arrington asserted that act a equilibrise course of study provide help children develop their skills and meet their call for to participate in the society.To be sufficient to achieve a balanced political platform, teachers and administrators look a series of workshops wherein the said scheme is elaborated and simulated.Then, after the realization of the magnificence of having a balanced curriculum, these people makes an lying-in to align their planned curriculum with field and state standards involving a series of modifications and compromises to their have got standards (Squires & Arrington, 1999).The balancing process also involves the opinion of the curriculum in two shipway the performance and the format assessments. These two methods were knowing to see both the understanding and employment of concepts by the students. It is through thi s last step that the decision-makers examine if they were fitted to balance their curriculum or not and fix those programs that are not fit to complement their expectations.As give tongue to earlier, the article poses some strengths and weaknesses. For its strengths, in pursuing a balanced curriculum, the teachers and administrators go away denudation it easier to teach their students while at the equivalent time having an assurance that the students understand the lessons and will be able to integrate such learning in their following years.Moreover, the students will also find it easier to relate to the lessons with an mountainion of the concepts and have a higher fall out of performing well in the national exams with the improved preparations made.On the contrary, applying a balanced curriculum requires a lot of work and policy-making skills especially since it involves the process of aligning and assessments. In addition to that, a great bar of effort is needed in alig ning ones curriculum to the national standards and framework.To be able to enhance the positive manifestations of a balanced curriculum and to be able to commute the weaknesses to something beneficial for the teachers, the decision-makers should really be ordered and eager in pursuing their want curriculum especially since it requires a lot of studies and thinking. Moreover, the involved people especially the teachers should cover to have a drive in enhancing their curriculum for the welfare of their students.Lastly, looking bandaging at the article of Squires and Arrington, it is observably an infixed and critical study in the development of the teaching methods of teachers and their standards. It is also very historic as a basis for new(prenominal) researchers in developing the curriculum utilise by instructors and how the students will be able to cover everything they need for a specific grade level.ReferencesSquires, D.A. & Arrington, A. (1999). A Balanced Curriculum Sta ndards and Assessments for High Performance. Teachers College Columbia University.